Re: HTB --> fw and u32

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ehlo!

On śro, 2003-11-12 at 09:26, raptor wrote:

<cut/>

> Now what I read in the LARTC docs :
> 
> 9.6. Classifying packets with filters
> ................
> You can't filter a packet 'upwards', by the way. Also, with HTB, you
should attach all filters to the root!
> ......

<cut/>

I've noticed that also. Can anyone explain why I should attach all
filters to root when using HTB and what could happen if I don't respect
that?

BTW, why there's no "reply-to: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" in header? I think
it would be a good idea. Or maybe I did something wrong?

Greetings

-- 
 --== Jacek "Dino" Bilski ==--  --== Registered Linux User #165468 ==--
    --== dino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ==--         --== GG# 3484913 ==--
-= 1024D/5B44CFBE   2228 3F73 A678 81C3 4ABE 2617 C77C AE70 5B44 CFBE =-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux