On Thursday 30 October 2003 07:10, Suraj Shankar wrote: > > > available, right? > > Most modems have a hugh queue to speed up downloads. > > But that queue can kill > > the shaping you did. So you have to be sure the > > queue is never full. And > > the only thing to do so is to never send more data > > then the modem can handle. > > So you have to make sure YOU are the bottleneck. > > yes, I have a proof-of-concept! ... meaning wrote a > script that works but, waiting to take it 'live'. > http://lartc.org/lartc.html#AEN939 ; the part that > lists parameters in CBQ ... was wondering how 'cell' > can be defined. If you bound a class, the class can never send more then the configure rate. So that's the ceil. If you add a sub class (not bounded), that class has to respect the rate (in this case also the ceil) of it's parente. > > One of the reasons why I like htb is you don't need > > these confusing options. > > And htb don't rely on the nic hardware to calculate > > the actual rate. > hmm, that's true. And htb is maintained, while the cbq code is not. > > Ah the WRR schedule. I think one of these > > parameters is the weight. Just > > take weight = rate / 10. > > okey, but how do I set it ... > Usage: ... cbq bandwidth BPS avpkt BYTES [ mpu BYTES ] > [ cell BYTES ] [ ewma LOG ] > ...this is what tc...help says, there isn't a weight > parameter :( Don't trust the help function :(. My tip : go to http://docum.org, go to the test pages and copy my cbq commands ,) > Stef, I do really appreciate the time spent in trying > to help me. Thank you. No problem. Stef -- stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
