> > Its bizzare how the "linux bandwidth arbitrator" authors have > never heard of HTB, LARTC people have not heard of "arbitrator". :) > > arbitrator has some nice features, it acctually tracks the > bandwidth usage and can limit the big spenders - so its more > dynamic than pure "tc". But it's very useful function isn't it ? > The problem is its completelly different than "tc" and > requires a number of strange kernel patches (that perhaps are > not tested enough). > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
