Yah, A and C on different ip networks and also different vlan. It's only example, in the real test i use zebra with a lot of vlan interfaces and connect to some cisco switch. And discover that some networks in different vlan can't reach, when i try to see unreachable networks using arp, i found uncomplete arp from it. Until now i don't know why some vlans works fine but the others not.. :( I think it's because arp, may be need to wait for long time before arp get complete. I try this just for half an hour. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ryan Goldberg" <rgoldber-list-lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Kristiadi Himawan" <kristiadi_himawan@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "lartc" <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 6:02 AM Subject: Re: Htb on trunked line > On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 15:39, Kristiadi Himawan wrote: > > About your first option to plug the linux box to the switch and create vlan > > interfaces on it, i have try that before and the result some network can't > > reach because of arp uncomplete. > > Are A and C on different IP networks? With routes to each other via the > IPs on the subinterfaces on the linux box and they can arp for those > IPs, I don't see where the arp issue would come from. > > > And the second option to put linux box between router and switch is the > > better choice but i face new problem on it. > > I already create transparent bridge (using eth0 and eth1) on the linux box > > and it's work. > > But the problem occur when i try to shape the link using HTB or CBQ, the > > filter always miss. > > I will try your suggestion to bridge every vlan interfaces in the linux box. > > I hope this is the solution. > > Yeah we do this it works fine. That is, with a bridge per VLAN. If you > want to share bandwidth amond the interfaces though, you need to set up > IMQ, which I have not done. > > > > On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 13:41, Kristiadi Himawan wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > > > > > I have configuration like this : > > > > > > > > DVB Modem > > > > | | ___Link A > > > > \ / trunk / > > > > CiscoRouter ------------CiscoSwitch-------Link B > > > > \___Link C > > > > > > Ryan Goldberg wrote: > > > Plug the linux box into the switch, set the link to dot1q, add > > > subinterfaces on the linux box, set As and Cs routes to each other via > > > the IPs on those subinterfaces, and do the shaping on those > > > subinterfaces. Should work no problem. > > > > > > Or are you trying to put the linux box in between the switch and > > > router? Then you'd have to talk dot1q to both devices and bridge each > > > corresponding valn to each othter (e.g eth0.3 bridged with eth1.3) and > > > do the shaping on those interfaces. That should also work. > > > _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
