On Monday 15 September 2003 23:00, Curtis V. Schleich wrote: > Trying 4000 right now, I'll try 1500 after I have a chance to see if 4000 > makes any difference. I have put new commands and stats (which I will > update periodically over the next few hours) at the > http://wireless.ccaonline.com/lartc/ site. On initial examination it does > not seem to be making any significant difference. I've still got very > laggy ping times, which I did not have when we were using CBQ. During the > HTB research, I did discover that my CBQ setup was probably weird. I had a > class for each user directly off the root, and the total rates FAR exceeded > the available bandwidth. So from what I read it was probably pretty > whacked, but I always seemed to have stable pings under 10ms. These are > all over the map (or graph as the case may be). Can put your cbq setup on your web-server? So we can compare.... Stef -- stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
