Sorted. The problem was related to one of the filter statements. Interesting how we alwayts overlook the simple explanations as to why something does not work. Thanks for all the help. Wayne ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stef Coene" <stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Wayne" <wayne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 5:17 PM Subject: Re: [LARTC] FTP Connection Tracking in a Bridge > On Wednesday 20 August 2003 14:39, Wayne wrote: > > I have applied the patch to IPTABLES which allows me to use it on a bridge. > > The iptables rules are working as I am using it for other things as well. > > If you do not have the patch applied, you get an error message when trying > > to run IPTABLES. > > > > The one filter rule I am using is as follows: > > > > tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:2 protocol ip prio 1 handle 2 fw classid > > 1:2a > > > > I have the browsing match into the IPTABLES as it is a simpler one to check > > if it is working before I try the FTP connection tracking portion. > You need more filter statements. You have parent 1:2 but how is traffic > redirected to this class ??? > > Stef > > -- > > stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx > "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" > http://www.docum.org/ > #lartc @ irc.oftc.net > >