[LARTC] VRFs under 2.4/2.5?
Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
To
: <
lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: [LARTC] VRFs under 2.4/2.5?
From
: "Tsillas, Demetrios J" <
jtsillas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 13:16:45 -0400
Delivered-to
: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
List-archive
: <
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/
>
List-help
: <
mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help
>
List-id
: Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control list <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post
: <
mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
>
List-subscribe
: <
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc
>,<
mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc
>,<
mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe
>
Sender
:
lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index
: AcM8BrgkiqlkCttuR/G+5HbnO/bNLA==
Thread-topic
: VRFs under 2.4/2.5?
Is there a VRF implementation in a recent kernel?
Documentation?
thanks,
-Jim.
Follow-Ups
:
Re: [LARTC] VRFs under 2.4/2.5?
From:
Shawn
Prev by Date:
Re: [LARTC] A new classful qdisc (CBFQ) is available now.
Next by Date:
Re: [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>???
Previous by thread:
[LARTC] u32 offsets--only in multiples of 4??(redhat 9.0)
Next by thread:
Re: [LARTC] VRFs under 2.4/2.5?
Index(es):
Date
Thread
[Index of Archives]
[LARTC Home Page]
[Netfilter]
[Netfilter Development]
[Network Development]
[Bugtraq]
[GCC Help]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux Kernel]
[Fedora Users]