Re: [LARTC] u32 clarification...limits on 2000>???

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



No, this is of cause incorrect. Just forgot to change it.
Should be 192.168.0.0/16

Michael

On Thursday 26 June 2003 03:27 am, you wrote:
> /root/bin/tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 13:0 prio 5 u32 ht 800:: \
>     match ip dst 66.114.0.0/16 hashkey mask 0x0000ff00 at 16 link 2:
> /root/bin/tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 13:0 prio 5 u32 ht 800:: \
>     match ip dst 66.114.0.0/16 hashkey mask 0x000000ff at 16 link 3:
> #--- end of filters ---
> 
> Is it correct ?( the hashkey seems to me it matches the 168 and X from 192.168.X.Y)
> 
> Alex
> Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is the script I'm using to create tc configuration to shape
> > currently about 8000 ips separately so that each ip has guaranteed
> > bandwith and cannot exceed it. The script can be used to
> > shape up to class B. The configuration is using double hashing
> > for filtering rules. I haven't used it in production yet, but it shows
> > pretty good result on a testbed.
> > To test it further I've created configuration to shape range
> > 192.168.1.0-192.168.254.0 (almost class B), i.e.about 65000 classes
> > and about 65000 filters. It takes very long time to apply on my
> > rather slow (P166mmx) test machine, but it doesn't throw a word
> > of complaint.
> >
> > Creating configuration:
> > root@xxxx:~/perl/qos# time ./qos.conf
> >
> > real    0m42.733s
> > user    0m40.950s
> > sys     0m0.490s
> >
> > It creates file rc.qos. Applying configuration:
> > root@xxxx:~/perl/qos# time . ./rc.qos
> >
> > real    125m48.033s
> > user    28m40.660s
> > sys     95m59.420s
> >
> > root@xxxxxxx:~/perl/qos# tc qdisc ls | wc -l
> >   64520
> > root@xxxxxxx:~/perl/qos# tc filter ls dev eth0 parent 13:0 | wc -l
> >  129042
> > (2 output lines for a filter).
> >
> > So the answer to your question most likely is no. There's no limit.
> > Hint: I've experienced something like that when I tried to use precompiled
> > binary (actually I compiled it myself but on different machine).
> > The errors were gone after I recompiled tc from the same sources
> > on the machine where it's being used. Could be some libraries
> > incompatibilities or changes made to some header files.
> > So look at the script if you're interested.
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > p.s. I'm not sure that larts list manager will allow attachment through.
> > If it doesn't and you want the script - email me.
> >
> > On Tuesday 24 June 2003 06:13 pm, Trevor Warren wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > >  If this isn't a limit of U32 filters then whats wrong with the way i
> > > have set things up???. The issue has to be somewhere right.
> > >
> > >  Also, i do appreciate you not wanting to give me your config. But at
> > > least give me a couple of lines of your U32 filter usage such that i can
> > > make 5000> filters using it and test. Only passing your u32 filter
> > > config.....if its your equivalent to IP then its fine with me...:)
> > >
> > >  I will have the test script mailed across to all. I am in DESPERATE
> > > need for help on this part......:(
> > >
> > > Trevor
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2003-06-25 at 12:55, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > Hello!
> > > >
> > > > >  I do understand that limits on u32 filters > 2000 have never been
> > > > > encountered. Run this script which is base on htb and lemme know. You
> > > > > will need 2.4.20 > and tc compiled for htb.
> > > >
> > > > It gives me a lot of "RTNETLINK answers: File exists".
> > > > This doesn't seems to be a limit.
> > > >
> > > > >  Can you please send me your config and lemme compare the same against
> > > > > mine.
> > > > I have main in a database. I cannot give it to you, but trust me that are
> > > > 50000 filters.
> > > >
> > > > Try to use hashes to reduce the kernel pressure.
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Trevor
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 15:49, Catalin BOIE wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Trevor Warren wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Can some one please confirm which would be the best place to clarify
> > > > > > > these U32 issues and 2048 U32 filter limitations as i had posted in my
> > > > > > > previous mail.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Trevor
> > > > > >
> > > > > > We have 50000 filters and still working.
> > > > > > I don't think there is a limit.
> >
> >   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >                Name: qos.conf
> >    qos.conf    Type: Perl Program (application/x-perl)
> >            Encoding: 7bit
> 
> 



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux