Stef Coene wrote: > On Monday 16 June 2003 19:07, Albert Martorell wrote: > > Hi everybody! > > > > I've been trying with htb and tc filter. It seemed to work fine, but > > after testing with ethloop I've realized that traffic is not being > > distributed through the leaves as I thought. When sending packets to > > 1:10 and 1:11 at the same time, there's no bandwidth sharing. There's no > > traffic through 1:11 until traffic through 1:10 has finished. Though > > I've tried assigning different prio's, 1:10 always gets more > > bandwidth... > I also did some test and used ethloop But I had good restults. You can find > more info on > http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/tests/htb/parent/ Thanks, I'll take a look. > > > > Here's the script that reproduces this behaviour: > > > > tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 12 r2q 10 > > tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 600kbit ceil > > 600kbit > > tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 200kbit ceil > > 600kbit > > tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:11 htb rate 200kbit ceil > > 600kbit > > tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:12 htb rate 200kbit ceil > > 600kbit > > tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 handle 20: sfq perturb 10 > > tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:11 handle 21: sfq perturb 10 > > tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:12 handle 22: sfq perturb 10 > > > > tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1: u32 match ip sport 53 > > 0xffff flowid 1:10 > > tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1: u32 match ip src 1.2.3.4 > > match ip sport 80 0xffff flowid 1:11 > I did my tests with ethloop on lo and you used eth0. Do you have a loopback > connecter installed on eth0? I see my first mistake has been testing directly on ethernet devices without a loopback connector... Anyway I've tried with ethloop on lo and the results are the same. Thx. Albert
