The first thing that bugs me, is that you are hashing 64K ip addresses onto a 256 slot hash table. This means 10.0.0.1 and 10.0.1.1 both go to the same class. Hashtables are limit to 256 entries (AFAICS), which is why you need to pre-select the class C like in my previous example. Gideon On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 16:11, Matias BjÃrling wrote: > Hey > > Can anybody tell me what i'm doing wrong, im getting crasy of this > hashing filters, and the doc at lartc is too unexplained for me. Can't > get it to work > > # tc qdisc del dev eth0 root > /dev/null > # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb > # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:2 htb rate 100MBit ceil > 100MBit > > # tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:2 prio 5 protocol ip u32 > # tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:2 handle 2: protocol ip u32 divisor > 256 > > // Adding a divisor > # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:10 htb rate 512kbit ceil > 512kbit burst 0k > # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:2 u32 ht 2:1: match ip > src 10.0.0.1 flowid 1:10 > > # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:11 htb rate 512kbit ceil > 512kbit burst 0k > # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:2 u32 ht 2:2: match ip > src 10.0.0.2 flowid 1:11 > > # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:13 htb rate 512kbit ceil > 512kbit burst 0k > # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:2 u32 ht 2:4: match ip > src 10.0.0.4 flowid 1:13 > > # tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:2 classid 1:15 htb rate 512kbit ceil > 512kbit burst 0k > # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:2 u32 ht 2:6: match ip > src 10.0.0.6 flowid 1:15 > > // Making Hashing Filtering for Network 10.0.0.0/16 > # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:2 prio 5 u32 ht 800:: > match ip src 10.0.0.0/16 hashkey mask 0x000000ff at 12 link 2: > > I know i have to set > # tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1: protocol ip prio 100 match ip > src 10.0.02 classid 1:2 > between the class and filter where i point to the src ip. But it wont > accept the config. telling me that > > Unknown filter "match", hence option "ip" is unparsable > > It's breaking my neck soon am i'm going crazy :) > > If any have a working script with more than 256 hosts, i would greatly > appreciate it :) > > Thank You > > Regards > > Matias BjÃrling >
