[LARTC] cbq vs htb?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

Does anyone know when one should use cbq versus (simpler more accurate) htb?  Specifically does cbq have added functionality that may be of interest to certain applications?  

from htb home>  Both CBQ and HTB help you to control the use of the
outbound bandwidth on a given link. Both allow you to use one physical link to simulate several slower links and to send different kinds of traffic on different
simulated links. In both cases, you have to specify how to divide the physical link into simulated links and how to decide which simulated link to use for a given
packet to be sent.   http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm

Thanks for any insight,

Torsten


[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux