Re: [LARTC] Unclarified issue

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 12 May 2003 15:35, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> Hi all,
> Just finished reading and re-reading the advanced routing how-to. This this
> is marvelous!!! Thank you all that spent your time and devoted it to such a
> great paper! However there is something that I am missing from the picture.
> By default each interface is bundled with the pfifo_fast that prioritizes
> the packets based on TOS. If for say we do this: # tc qdisc add dev eth0
> root tbf rate 100kbit latency 100ms urst 2048 Do we actually lose the whole
> point of TOS? Or there is stil an underlying filter somewhere in the kernel
> that will take care of the TOS scheduling just like pfifo_fast did?
You loose the TOS settings.

> Also in the following example:
> # tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio
> We automatically create three handles 1:1 1:2 1:3, with the default
> priomap. However what happens to traffic that goes down 1:1 if there is no
> qdisc attached to it? Does it get dequeued right off the back or there is
> again something similar to pfifo_fast waiting for it?
There is always a qdisc responsible for sending the packets.  If you add a 
prio qdisc, you also created 3 small fifo qdiscs for each class.

If you want some example shaping scripts (mostly cbq and htb), you can go to 
docum.org.

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux