In LARTC (v1.32), under 4.2.1 Split access, the following note appears: >Reader Rod Roark notes: 'If $P0_NET is the local network and $IF0 is >its interface, the following additional entries are desirable: > > ip route add $P0_NET dev $IF0 table T1 > ip route add $P2_NET dev $IF2 table T1 *** > ip route add 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo table T1 > ip route add $P0_NET dev $IF0 table T2 > ip route add $P1_NET dev $IF1 table T2 *** > ip route add 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo table T2 I've market two particular lines for my question: Wouldn't these two lines (marked with ***) explicitly permit traffic arriving on $IF1 ($P1_NET) to be routed back out on $IF2 ($P2_NET), and vice versa? Under what conditions would I want traffic arriving at my router from ISP #1 to be sent back out to ISP #2, or vice versa? Have I overlooked something important here? --Carol Anne Carol Anne Ogdin http://www.net-working.com 530/295-3657 Deep Woods Technology, Inc. http://www.deepwoods.com CAOgdin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Leveraging technology to restore the soul of the organization