On Monday 05 May 2003 21:15, miller69@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > On Monday 05 May 2003 20:10, miller69@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > That works very well but at some point of my project i need to switch
> >
> > over
> >
> > > just using one mark (or more exact using just one firewall-rule) for
> >
> > both
> >
> > > filters. So i tried to change the second filter:
> > >
> > > tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 4 handle 12 fw
> >
> > classid
> >
> > > 1:12
> > > tc filter add dev eth1 parent 2:0 protocol ip prio 4 handle 12 fw
> >
> > classid
> >
> > > 2:22
> > >
> > > That did not work, just the first filter was used but the other never
> > > catched a paket. My question: is there a way to handle this by a mask
> >
> > for
> >
> > > the handle for example? Any hints are very much appreciated!
> >
> > Why not doing
> > tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 4 handle 12 fw classid
> > 2:22
>
> I've tried it and the answer was:
> RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
>
> So that did not work. Any other ideas? I really need this going!
Something else. Qdisc 2:0 is attached to 1:12 I suppose. But why? This is
not needed if 1: and 2: are htb qdiscs.
Stef
--
stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
