Stef, Thanks for your advise, it should be a better idea than mine. Anyway, how can I make that config? Here I attach my config, but I think it is still not a correct one. Thx & Rgds, Awie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stef Coene" <stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Awie" <awie@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 11:25 PM Subject: Re: [LARTC] Configuration of CBQ > On Sunday 27 April 2003 16:52, Awie wrote: > > All, > > > > I plan to config my network by using CBQ (Attached the configuration > > files). I want to do a packet prioritization instead traffic shaping > > (perhaps in the future I will need it). > > > > The result that I want : > > > > 1. HTTP gets the 1st priority > > 2. SMTP and some other packet get the 2nd > > 3. FTP gets the 3rd > > > > Should I configure the "priority default"? (I did it in Cisco router, last > > time) > > > > Your answer is very appreciated. Many thanks for your help. > What do you mean with priority?? Do you mean that all HTTP traffic should be > send first? If you do, then you a big download can kill all FTP or SMTP > traffic. To prevent this, you have to shape the traffic. > > Isn't it better to say that http can always use at least 60% of the link? If > there is no other traffic, HTTP can use 100%. Ftp can use 100% traffic, but > of there is other traffic, it will fal back to 10. > > So something like this: > HTTP : 60 % > SMTP : 30 % > FTP : 10 % > > Traffic that can use a higher priority is real-time traffic like telnet, ssh > or traffic that needs low delays like ACK. > > Stef > > -- > > stef.coene@xxxxxxxxx > "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" > http://www.docum.org/ > #lartc @ irc.oftc.net > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ >
Attachment:
cbq-4.ftp
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
cbq-3.misc
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
cbq-2.eth0
Description: Binary data
