Re: [LARTC] fair traffic allocation for 100 Users, is HTB the solution?

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

To: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LARTC] fair traffic allocation for 100 Users, is HTB the solution?
From: Matthias Weingart <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:48:48 +0100
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
In-reply-to: <200303241705.38199.stef.coene@docum.org>; from stef.coene@docum.org on Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 05:05:38PM +0100
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control list <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>,<mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>,<mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20030324165442.A26950@pentax.boerde.de> <200303241705.38199.stef.coene@docum.org>
Sender: lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

Thx for your reply and the short description; HTB seems really simple, worth
 a try.

        Matthias

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [LARTC] fair traffic allocation for 100 Users, is HTB the solution?
  - From: Stef Coene

References:
- [LARTC] fair traffic allocation for 100 Users, is HTB the solution?
  - From: Matthias Weingart
- Re: [LARTC] fair traffic allocation for 100 Users, is HTB the solution?
  - From: Stef Coene