RE: [LARTC] Intelligent P2P detection

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Luman" <llu@xxxxx>, "'Kim Jensen'" <kimj@xxxxxxx>,<lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [LARTC] Intelligent P2P detection
From: Robert Kryczało <robert.kryczalo@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 16:27:39 +0100
Delivered-to: lartc@outpost.ds9a.nl
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <001a01c2f2cd$f580c670$872396c3@Lion>
List-archive: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/>
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control list <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>,<mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>,<mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,
>Yes, if there isn't any proper tool already, the conntrack could be a
>good template for the beginning.

Things worth considering are also helper.patch and CONNMARK.patch for per
connection based marking.

Luman

References:
- RE: [LARTC] Intelligent P2P detection
  - From: Luman

Prev by Date: RE: [LARTC] Intelligent P2P detection
Next by Date: Re: [LARTC] fair traffic allocation for 100 Users, is HTB the solution?
Previous by thread: How to assign weight to multipath route
Next by thread: Re: [LARTC] Intelligent P2P detection
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LARTC Home Page] [Netfilter] [Netfilter Development] [Network Development] [Bugtraq] [GCC Help] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux