On Thursday 20 March 2003 23:36, Julian Anastasov wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Gordan Bobic wrote: > > Provided the DS9 patch works for me, is it possible to somehow prioritize > > what is dropped first and what is dropped last? Something like attaching > > a prio/cbq to the ingress qdisc? For example, I want SSH/POP3/IMAP4 > > traffic to be dropped last, and FTP/SMTP traffic to be dropped first. Can > > ingress support in DS9 do this, or is it limited to indiscriminately > > dropping traffic? > > Except if someone has another idea, may be only dropping. > I'm not sure there is IMQ for 2.2 :) It doesn't appear to be there with the patches I applied... :-( > May be you can look at > Edge31-ca-u32 from the iproute2 examples, there are some ideas > about using policers. I have tried the ingress policing when the new patches, but according to my mrtg graphs, it still doesn't seem to work, even in it's simplest form. I THINK I saw it work with FTP, though (connection throttled), so I am not sure. It could be that it works initially, then stops later. I will investigate further... > As for DS9, it tries to provide the same > interface to all qos objects as in 2.4, so it is possible to do > the same things as in 2.4, of course, there is one problem, nobody > wants to support new features in 2.2 :) Yeah, I know. I will upgrade at some point. ;-) I seem to be having a problem with the newly applied patches, though. After 6-8 hours, I get a kernel crash. Black screen od death, hex dumps, Aiee, killing interrupt handler, trying to kill idle task, etc. This happened twice, so it seems unlikely to be a coincidence, as the only patches applied were the DS9, rtree, HTB3 and routes. It used to be stable before. I am hoping that it is ingress related stuff that kills it, so I have turned that off (everything to do with ingress). We'll see if I get another crash now. If not, than it would appear that it is ingress policing that kills it after a while. I will report back on this when I know more. Regards. Gordan
