RE: [LARTC] ip rule and transparent proxy.

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



	It did't work becasue the packet is trying to go out on the
secondary interface using the address of the primary interface, so the
packet get dropped by the ISP.
	Well, the MARK on the OUTPUT mangle worked well actually, deviating
the traffic, just creating the source address problem.

	Am I forgetting something?
	
	Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Esteban Ribicic
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:00 PM
To: Stephane Ouellette
Cc: Esteban Ribicic; Alessandro Ren; LARTC
Subject: Re: [LARTC] ip rule and transparent proxy.


after marking the packet, it is posible to route over ip (marking in
output)...packet goes to the gw you choose..routeing after is other issue,
as you cant know or predict what will do your isp router.

the packet will go where you told him to go (through fwmarks) with src
address as kernel algorithm says so (probably, if not bind() called, the ip
address of the interface on wich the default gw is setted)..

if the src address of the packet does not match with the interface you
choose, is probably that the packet leaves the interface and never come back
-my scpecial case, is that my two links are from the same isp and they route
the packet trgout a default route in their router- ..so packets leaves from
one interface and comes in the other... but, you can (i hvent tryed this,
but i think it should work) nat the src adress and packet will go and
come....maybe you shlud nat the packet again when it comes...
example: ip rule add from all fwmark 0x1 nat [your ip] table pppx..for
example..

i have working hwat i said on my linux box for squid packets..the go from
one interface and come in the other.

steve

On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 12:40, Stephane Ouellette wrote:
> Esteban Ribicic wrote:
> 
> >you should try marking squid packets (output chain for example) and 
> >then add a rule (ip rule ls).. in lartc.org 
> >http://www.lartc.org/lartc.pdf have plenty of examples.
> >  
> >
> 
>    Unfortunately, this will not work.  It is not possible to route a
> locally-generated packet using a firewall mark because the routing 
> decision is taken before the packet is sent to the MANGLE OUTPUT chain. 
>   Routing a packet using a firewall mark works only in the PREROUTING 
> Netfilter hook.
> 
> Stephane Ouellette
> 
> >tips: when marking packets on iptables, use hexa not decimal notting. 
> >try patching the kernel if does not work (http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/) 
> >cause kernel default source may not work...
> >
> >and its probably that squid use as source adrres of ip header the ip 
> >on the default route, so you might have to nat that src to the other 
> >interface (so packets leave the interface you want and come back in 
> >that interface and not the other -if they come..- )
> >
> >greets and good speed.
> >
> >On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 10:27, Alessandro Ren wrote:
> >  
> >
> 

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux