julian, the patch stuff is making me crazy (i have four servers running iproute2).. i tryed to apply pathces on 2.4.20 in the following order so multipath, nat, fwmark works: routes-2.4.20-9.diff rtmasq-2.4.20-2.diff is the second patch necesary? i though the first (routes-2.4.20-9.diff) already patched the nat stuff. besides, if i apply the first patch, the second gives me an error applyeng the patch. what patches should apply for 2.4.20? thanks. On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 20:30, Julian Anastasov wrote: > > Hello, > > On 4 Mar 2003, Esteban Ribicic wrote: > > > when doing somehitng like > > ip rule add fwmark 3 nat 200.42.75.183 table ppp0 prio 1 > > (the idea is that packets that match the fwmark 3 change their source > > address to 200.42.75.183)..it first apply the nat and then routes to > > table ppp0 right? > > in such case the, nat, why may be nat not being applyed? > > cause it doesnt work at all..it goes to that interface but does not nat > > the src address of the package. > > any idea? > > It is not supported but there is a patch: > > http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/#rtmasq > > Regards > > -- > Julian Anastasov <ja@xxxxxx> > > -- Esteban Ribicic Network Operation Center UOL-Sinectis S.A. Florida 537 Piso 6, Buenos Aires, Argentina +54-11-4321-9110 Ext 2503 +54-11-4321-9107 Directo eribicic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.uolsinectis.com
