1. I recommend you to get the HTB. http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/htbman.htm then try the following configuration: If you have 4 connections and 2Mbit/s incoming The ceil value is 2Mbit/s, the rate is 2Mbit/s / 4 - 512Kbit ------------------------------------------------ tc qdisc add dev eth1 root handle 1: htb # Luzerta - tuka e slozno mai tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:0 classid 1:1 htb rate 512Kbit ceil 2Mbit burst 10k cburst 5k prio tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:0 classid 1:2 htb rate 512Kbit ceil 2Mbit burst 10k cburst 5k prio tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:0 classid 1:3 htb rate 512Kbit ceil 2Mbit burst 10k cburst 5k prio tc class add dev eth1 parent 1:0 classid 1:4 htb rate 512Kbit ceil 2Mbit burst 10k cburst 5k prio tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:1 handle 110: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:2 handle 120: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:3 handle 130: sfq perturb 10 tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:4 handle 130: sfq perturb 10 #Filters - using lw - marking packets for IP's tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 handle 101 fw flowid 1:1 tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 handle 102 fw flowid 1:2 tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 handle 103 fw flowid 1:3 tc filter add dev eth1 parent 1:0 protocol ip prio 10 handle 104 fw flowid 1:4 # OR Filters - using u32 #tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip dst 10.0.0.1 flowid 1:1 #tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip dst 10.0.0.2 flowid 1:2 #tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip dst 10.0.0.3 flowid 1:3 #tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip dst 10.0.0.4 flowid 1:4 ------------------------------------------ This will balance the traffic in following way: - Whe 1 IP downloading - 2Mbit/s for that IP - When all IP's downloading - 2Mbit/s / 4 (512Kbit/s) for each - When 3 IP's downloading - 2Mbit/s / 3 (~683Kbit/s) for each Don Cohen wrote: > Sorry, I'm a little behind here, trying to catch up > > From: "Dmitri Gofmekler" <dmitri@xxxxxxxx> > To: <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 15:38:13 +0200 > > As far as I know that the traffic that will pass thru the router is balanced > so that all connections have the same privilegies. Is it possible to > configure the linux based router so that all computers will have the same > privilegies? I mean that if in default case full traffic is splitted by > connections, so I need to split it by users to prevent one user occupy all > traffic by starting 150 simulations downloads with FlashGET for example, but > he should be able to occupy all channel if no one else require the traffic > this time. > > My interpretation is that you have one link shared among multiple > computers that can be distinguished by their IP addresses and you > want to share the link fairly among those computers. > There is no current out-of-the-box solution that I know of but this > is so similar to SFQ that you can make the change very easily. > SFQ offers fair service to "flows" defined by source/dest IP/port. > You just want to change that to destination IP for packets coming in > from the internet, and source address for packets going out to the > internet. If you look at the SFQ code there's a hash function that > looks at ports and IP addresses. I propose two variants, one of which > comments out all but the destination IP address, the other comments > out all but the source IP address. > You can use the version that looks at the source at the interfaces > going out to the internet and the version that looks at the > destination at interfaces going to the local networks. > I hope that makes sense. > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://ds9a.nl/lartc/
