Hey Bert, I'd like to go through detail of nice effort made by you peoples. As you answered, to use IMQ for my requirement, I placed this question. How did you answered is quite sarcastic to me. I feel that you forgot yourself as a good contributor of open-source. Otherwise there would be a warm support to test your development at one more place and feedback you. Oh yeah I confess that I'm a novice in open-source development but not newbie and very much experienced with Linux kernel network code. Which includes netfilter hack, some driver modification and detail understanding of Linux routing code... Anyway I'm not intended to describe my skills. I won?t replace my request to you, infact this time loud against whatever I shown you for my contribution; ya simple but not trivial "a detail feedback". Thankx if you take some time off to write for me to go ahead task. -- Sumit -----Original Message----- From: bert hubert [mailto:ahu@xxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2001 5:51 PM To: Sumit Pandya Cc: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devik@xxxxxx Subject: Re: Re: [LARTC] Re: Two-way Shared Traffic shaping and NAT On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 01:48:35PM +0530, Sumit Pandya wrote: > Hi Devik and All, > > >> You can find more information on http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/. There > is only one relase, but it's so simple, that are no bugs (according to > Devik). > I want an architecturial/functional details of your "IMQ" development. So you want that. > The document on the link is insufficient to explain anything. If you can You may be insufficiently smart to grasp it. I seriously think you did not grap how open source works. This is *not* the way to participate! Regards, bert
