On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 09:09:22AM -0200, Christoph Simon wrote: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 01:17:27 -0500 > Adrian Chung <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I followed the Nano-HOWTO, and can't say that I understand all of it, > > but I'm slowly trying to get a grasp. :) > > This probably means, that I didn't understand that part neither. Maybe > you want to tell me which parts you didn't understand so I can try to > add a comment. I didn't have trouble following the HOWTO, it was easy to follow. I'm just not sure I understand the reasoning for having to do certain steps, but that's not necessarily the goal of your HOWTO. Should I post my confusions to the list? Or offlist to you personally? > > I find though, that no matter what, even after flushing the route > > cache, some requests for 24.x.x.x addresses are still sent via eth2 > > even though eth1 is up and alive. > > Julian released yesterday v6 of his patch, which seems to address just > this problem. I never noticed, because once the setup is done, I never > change it. Yeah, that's what I'm using. I'm still not having any luck, but it might likely be my fault. -- Adrian Chung (adrian at enfusion-group dot com) http://www.enfusion-group.com/~adrian GPG Fingerprint: C620 C8EA 86BA 79CC 384C E7BE A10C 353B 919D 1A17 [rogue.enfusion-group.com] up 134 days, 2:00, 2 users
