On Sunday 9 December 2001 22:41, jamal wrote: > > It is a bit sad that one cannot queue packets in ingress. Would be quite > > useful to make ingress shaping behave more sane than what can be acheived > > with the queueless filter police mechanism. > > Look at the definition of work vs non-work conserving; This is design > intent. If you look at the datapath, it is totaly meaningless to put > queues at ingress, for routing when they are being queued on ingress as > well. Wouldn't it make sense to set a non-work conserving interface on ingress and a work conserving interface on egress ? That would be handy to share bandwidth between outgoing packets through different interfaces. Cedric
