On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:48:11PM +0100, bert hubert wrote: > On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 08:28:07PM +0100, Stefan Rompf wrote: ... > > tbf seems not to be able to do exact rate limiting, too. Anything wrong > > in my configuration, or am I just taking false statistics? > > Both I think. There are some indications that raising HZ may not work, as it > may not raise the resolution of the timers in the Linux Kernel - I am > investigating this! So try keeping HZ stable, and raising the size of your > bucket. would it make any difference if you do... --- linux/include/net/pkt_sched.h.bak Sun Nov 19 20:14:10 2000 +++ linux/include/net/pkt_sched.h Sun Nov 19 20:20:34 2000 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ #define PSCHED_JIFFIES 2 #define PSCHED_CPU 3 -#define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_JIFFIES +#define PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE PSCHED_CPU #include <linux/config.h> #include <linux/pkt_sched.h> I didn't see PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE in the 2.4routing docs... Can you tell more about PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE ? -- Safari - safari@xxxxxx - PGP key 0x427E7914 - http://www.iki.fi/safari/ The UNIX Guru's View of Sex: "unzip ; strip ; touch ; finger ; \ mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ; umount ; sleep"
