On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:32:15AM +0100, bert hubert wrote: > On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 11:16:49PM -0300, Alberto Bertogli wrote: > > > The comment, still present today (of course =) is: > > > > Note that the peak rate TBF is much more tough: with MTU 1500 > > P_crit = 150Kbytes/sec. So, if you need greater peak > > rates, use alpha with HZ=1000 :-) > > > > Even below in the description, when it describes peakrate parameter, it > > says "However, due to de default 10ms timer resolution of Unix, with > > 10.000 bits average packets, we are limited to 1mbit/s of peakrate!" > > 150Kbytes/sec -> 1mbit/s! (more or less). Depends a bit on what your average > packet size is. > Yeah I'm just stupid and read everything as bps. Luckly i forgot to CC to the list =) > SFQ doesn't shape, so it's a whole different ballgame. Yeah, I shape with CBQ anyway.. what reminds me to my next question: is HTB going to be merged in 2.4? is it ready for production use? Thanks, Alberto
