bert hubert wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 03:53:23PM +0200, Juri Haberland wrote:
>
> > > > If that works as intended, please let us know!
> > >
> > > I just tried and it does some funny things - still investigating...
> >
> > Ok, seems to work, but it looks like you have to have the default routes
> > in the order of the interfaces, e.g.:
> > eth0: 10.0.1.2 (/24)
> > eth1: 10.0.2.2 (/24)
> > ip route add default nexthop via 10.0.1.1 dev eth0 nexthop via 10.0.2.1
> > dev eth1
>
> I think that that's very unlikely. The important thing is: is this 'sticky'?
> Is a single TCP session mated to a single route automatically? Or does MASQ
> do this for you?
I just did a short test with ping. Ping went out through eth0. Then I
issued a 'ifconfig eth0 down' while ping was running. It went out
eth1...
Juri
--
If each of us have one object, and we exchange them,
then each of us still has one object.
If each of us have one idea, and we exchange them,
then each of us now has two ideas.
