Re: [LARTC] PRIOMAP, SPLIT, DEFMAP usage info + PRIO, TBF and other bugs

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ivan Lopez wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 02 Jul 2001 17:09:22 -0500
> Nikolai Vladychevski <niko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > > ness wrote:
> > >     experements I understand that it don't prioritize packets AT ALL.
> > > (I'll be glad
> > >     to hear that I'm wrong...)
> > >
> >
> > does not in my tests, I am also looking why ....
> 
> i was playing with net/sched/sch_prio.c, trying to analize what it does
> and modifying it just for write some crap in syslog and debug
> 
> i've done a few tests, ie doing a heavy upload and ping another machine
> over internet, putting icmp packets into band 0 of the prio qdisc, and the
> rest into band 1, and what i see is that the prio qdisc actually
> classifies packets into its bands according to filters you define, and in
> fact dequeues first all packets from the bands with the most priority...
> but the final result is not as expected, and i have the same delay as if i
> don't use any qos... i've tried attaching some different qdisc to the
> bands of the prio qdisc: tbf, sfq, just fifos...
> 
> it seems to me its that prio does its work just ok, but the problem is
> that the networking code is making dequeue the packets more fast than the
> link can transmit them, without care about if they are accumulating again
> at some point after
> 

I just found a nice paper with explanations about PRIO qdisc with
examples an figures, its in Chapter 7:

http://dcn.ssu.ac.kr/~softgear/prog_sw_report_summer_99.pdf



Nikolai



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux