Do you have a route (no default) to that destination? It should work if you do. Ramin On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 05:52:33PM -0300, Theo Cabrerizo Diem wrote: > Hi, > > I have one firewall with 3 ethernet cards, 2 internet links, one cisco > 2920 and one problem in RTNETLINK ;o) > > Let me explain my network : > > | *** Internet Link 1 *** *** Internet Link > 2 *** > 10.1.0.1| Serial Serial | 10.2.0.1 > |||| +--------------+ +------------+ > > | | > || +------------+ > 10.1.0.2| CISCO | 10.2.0.2 > +------+-----+ > 192.168.1.1 / 192.168.2.1 > | > eth2 192.168.1.2/ 192.168.2.1 > +------------+ > FIREWALL > +-+--------+-+ > 10.20.0.0 eth0| |eth1 10.30.0.0 > | | > MY DMZ NET MY CORPORATE NET > > I used reserved IPs for security reasons .. <sorry :o( > > What I'm trying to do: > I don't want to use my cisco default route, because I will do some > filtering, based on source address, at my firewall to choose wich link > to use, so I must add (at my firewall) a default route using my ISP 1 > end <10.1.0.1> at one routing table, and other default route using my > ISP 2 end <10.2.0.1> at another routing table, and do trafic control > using iptables/iproute <as described in Advanced Routing how-to>. > > the problem is ... RTNETLINK says Unreachable Network when I try to add > a route, using a gateway wich isn't directly connected to my firewall > :o( this is the line I'm trying to use : > <I know I'm not writing on a specific routing table to do traffic control> > > ip route add default via 10.1.0.1| > RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable > > So .. I've tried > ip route add default via 10.1.0.1 nexthop via 192.168.1.1 > RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument > > Can anyone help me ? If someone need more info, ask me ... <please > reply me at theoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx but I will check this list every day ;o) > > > []'s
