[LARTC] priority of class

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "'lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [LARTC] priority of class
From: Gery Kahn <geryk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:27:25 +0200
Delivered-to: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
List-archive: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control list <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I understand that "prio" optiion in tc class is useless
when you add cbq cause here you specifying to which kind
of QDISC your class connected, so can be CBQ, PRIO and etc.
kinds.
Anybody agree w/ me?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [LARTC] priority of class
  - From: Wingtung.Leung

Prev by Date: Re: [LARTC] can't generate a new rule
Next by Date: Re: Re: [LARTC] can't generate a new rule
Previous by thread: [LARTC] priority of class
Next by thread: Re: [LARTC] priority of class
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LARTC Home Page] [Netfilter] [Netfilter Development] [Network Development] [Bugtraq] [GCC Help] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux