Hi, > > tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:170 classid 1:30 cbq bandwidth 200Kbit > > rate 30Kbit weight 3Kbit prio 6 allot 1514 cell 8 maxburst 20 avpkt 1000 > > Shouldn't the parent class be 1:1 instead of 1:170 ?? > > I believe in the current scheme, 1:170 is child from 1:1 and 1:30 a child > from 1:170. I think you want both 1:170 as 1:30 to be children from 1:1. > I agree with this. Also, shouldn't root qdisc 1:0 have full interface bandwidth? and then root class 1:1 have "bandwidth $TOTAL rate 200kbit bounded" ? Something else, isn't it necesary to have a qdisc for each interface? Right now it's 1:0 for eth0 and 1:0 for eth1, I don't know if this works, I've always done it using (for example) 1:0 for eth0 and 2:0 for eth1. If I'm off track please tell me =) Cheers, Rodrigo
