Re: [LARTC] Suggestion for improvements to nexthop implementation

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Suggestion for improvements to nexthop implementation
From: "Bob Puff@xxx" <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 12:24:38 -0400
Delivered-to: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
List-archive: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control list <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <01052412184401.10694@rolf.missing.se>
Sender: lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> I have a server connected :
> 
>         eth2    ADSL 500kbps    ISP 1
>         eth1    Cable 1000kbps  ISP 2
>         eth0    LAN 100Mbps

I would like to see how this is also accomplished with the 2.2.x kernels.  Thanks.

Bob

References:
- [LARTC] Suggestion for improvements to nexthop implementation
  - From: Rolf MIssing

Prev by Date: [LARTC] Suggestion for improvements to nexthop implementation
Next by Date: Re: [LARTC] Simulation of WAN on LAN
Previous by thread: [LARTC] Suggestion for improvements to nexthop implementation
Next by thread: [LARTC] Priority to UDP?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LARTC Home Page] [Netfilter] [Netfilter Development] [Network Development] [Bugtraq] [GCC Help] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux