Antwort: Re: [LARTC] tc and masquerading probs

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

thank you for your support. Your idea, looking also at the source ip with
the u32 filter works very well.

Markus


wningtung.leung wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 May 2001 m.dages@xxxxxxx wrote:

>> Ok, now I've read the Linux 2.4 Advance Routing Howto and some other
>> documents that I could found about tc. All the examples describes an
>> environment with a linux box that has 2 ethernet cards, but our router
only
>> have 1. This ony ethernet adapter (eth0) is bounded to the ppp0 device
and
>> handles the LAN traffic.
>> Here's a short sheme:
>>
>> INTERNET  <----->   [ ppp0/Dynamic IP --- Linux router ---
>> eth0/192.168.100.250]  <------> Office Lan 192.168.100.0/24

>It doesn't matter wether it's a eth or ppp device, just look at it as a
>network interface and everything works fine.
>
>The solution I propose (haven't tested it though):
>
>Don't use firewall marks, but use the u32 filter instead.
>
>Look at the source and target IP and redirect the pakket to the correct
>class.
>
>(source != router && dest = low_prio_host)  ->  slow_class
>(source != router && dest = hi_prio_host)  ->  no_limit
>(source == router)  ->  no_limit
>
>This is only an idea for the downstream, I haven't been thinking about
>limitimg the upstream.






[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux