Hi,
OSFP is a dynamic routing protocol, isn't it. So is dynamic routing
going to solve my problem.
The problem is i do not want to use the best possible path ( cost vise ) to
route a packet. I have to make use of all the availabe bandwitdh of the 3
ISP's in the most efficient manner.
I have read about TEQ traffic equalizer. But it has been mentioned that you
cannot combine 3 different isps to act as one.
As if you are using TEQ at one end, you are bound to have it at the other
end.
with regards,
Sushil Suresh
----- Original Message -----
From: Ramin Alidousti <ramin@xxxxxx>
To: Arthur van Leeuwen <arthurvl@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Sushil Suresh <sushil@xxxxxxx>; <lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Will advanced linux routing help me
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:39:27AM +0200, Arthur van Leeuwen wrote:
>
> > Doei, Arthur. (The tricky part is the link-state monitoring... at the
TCP/IP
> > level this is theoretically impossible...)
>
> Yes, indeed. There is no special protocol for this. That's why OSPF and
> his younger and older brothers have those HELO packets. That's why TCP
> has the optional keepalive segments (although, in case of TCP it's an
> end-to-end behaviour).
>
> If you know the IP of the next hop router and if that router has not been
> instructed to ignore ICMP requests, ping might help. If you don't know
> the IP, pinging to the subnet broadcast will also do.
>
> Ramin
>
> >
> > --
> > /\ / | arthurvl@xxxxxxxxxx | Work like you don't need the
money
> > /__\ / | A friend is someone with whom | Love like you have never
been hurt
> > / \/__ | you can dare to be yourself | Dance like there's nobody
watching
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:
http://ds9a.nl/2.4Routing/
>
