All - I have what I think is a very simple problem but the solution has eluded me. I have three Token Ring interfaces in one box and I want to load balance outgoing traffic across the NICs. The system is a RH 6.2 base with 2.2.18 kernel and current RH errata. Based on the Adv-Routing HOWTO I have the proper stuff configured into the kernel already. I'm using DNS to do cheap and easy round robin style connections to the box. [scottrus@xxxxx scottrus]$ host ftp3.linux.ibm.com ftp3.linux.ibm.com has address 9.37.145.124 ftp3.linux.ibm.com has address 9.37.145.120 ftp3.linux.ibm.com has address 9.37.145.127 ip address show 1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 3924 qdisc noqueue link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00 inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope host lo 2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/ether 00:60:94:3f:15:63 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 10.200.1.33/24 brd 10.200.1.255 scope global eth0 3: tr0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 2000 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/tr 00:20:35:ff:09:66 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 9.37.145.124/20 brd 9.37.159.255 scope global tr0 4: tr1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 2000 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/tr 00:60:94:b2:19:dd brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 9.37.145.120/20 brd 9.37.159.255 scope global tr1 5: tr2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 2000 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100 link/tr 00:60:94:b2:19:6d brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 9.37.145.127/20 brd 9.37.159.255 scope global tr2 All trX interfaces are on the same subnet and use the same default gateway of 9.37.144.1. The eth0 interface is a private network. Traffic from the public Token Ring network should never cross onto the private eth0 network or visversa. I'm looking for one of two possible solutions: 1) Incoming requests are responded to on the same interface they came in on. For example an ftp connection coming in on tr1 has all TX / RX packets stick to tr1. 2) All output packets are load balanced across the tr0, tr1, tr2 interfaces regardless of which tr interface they came in on. (This is my preferred solution.) What's currently happening is requests come in on tr0, tr1, tr2 but outgoing traffic is being sent back only via tr0, the default route. [scottrus@xxxxx scottrus]$ ip route show 10.200.1.33 dev eth0 scope link 9.37.145.120 dev tr1 scope link 9.37.145.127 dev tr2 scope link 9.37.145.124 dev tr0 scope link 10.200.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.200.1.33 9.37.144.0/20 dev tr0 proto kernel scope link src 9.37.145.124 9.37.144.0/20 dev tr1 proto kernel scope link src 9.37.145.120 9.37.144.0/20 dev tr2 proto kernel scope link src 9.37.145.127 10.200.0.0/16 via 10.200.1.1 dev eth0 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo scope link default via 9.37.144.1 dev tr2 default via 9.37.144.1 dev tr1 default via 9.37.144.1 dev tr0 As you can see I've tried simply adding default routes for each token ring interface and I think this is a step in the right direction but I'm missing something. *sigh* I thought I knew it all, how wrong I was. I have to say all this is rather cool and beyond this initial problem I know I'm going to have play with it more just for fun. The very thought of being able to twist these packets into my own demented idea of how they should be handled is just to tempting to ignore. Baby steps, must remember to take baby steps. 1) Understand what the heck I've been reading all day. 2) Get the routes on ftp3 working so users stop yelling at me :) 3) Read more, play with iproute2, watch mailing list, help out. :) :) Any help would be great. Examples would be better of course. Thanks much! -- Regards, Scott Russell (scottrus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) Linux Technology Center, System Admin, RHCE.