Re: [LARTC] Advanced routing question.

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Paul Wouters wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Arthur van Leeuwen wrote:
> 
> > > 2>	Setup a fail over method so that if either internet connection were
> > > to fail it would start routing all outbound traffic over that link.
> 
> > Yes. Linux using Advanced Routing can be used to solve these problems, but
> > for problem 2: at the IP level there is no way to figure out wether or not a
> > link is down. Ofcourse, you can approximate problem 2, but you have no
> > guarantees that the problem lies with the link and not with the servers you
> > test your connectivity against, or the infrastructure to those servers
> > beyond your direct link.
> 
> What happens if you use the bonding driver and one of the two parts of the
> link goes down? Is that transparent?

What bonding driver? And no, a link failing is *not* transparent. It will
lead to intermittent connectivity problems, as the multipath routing code
will randomly keep selecting the failed link as well as the one still working.
You will have to do active monitoring. Yes, polling. Unfortunately. Let's
all hope for IPv6 and true NUD...

Doei, Arthur.

-- 
  /\    / |      arthurvl@xxxxxxxxxx      | Work like you don't need the money
 /__\  /  | A friend is someone with whom | Love like you have never been hurt
/    \/__ | you can dare to be yourself   | Dance like there's nobody watching




[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux