[LARTC] Conceptual (but fast :) question

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: lartc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [LARTC] Conceptual (but fast :) question
From: Juanjo Ciarlante <jjo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2000 12:31:10 -0300
Delivered-to: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
List-archive: http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/
List-help: <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=help>
List-id: Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control list <lartc.mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-post: <mailto:lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
List-subscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc>, <mailto:lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: lartc-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Why do CBQ setups need leaf qdiscs (tbf, sfq, etc) to achieve CBQ rate?
 (and all the (aparently) redundant rate setup ...? )

TIA
Juanjo

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [LARTC] Conceptual (but fast :) question
  - From: Wingtung.Leung
- SV: [LARTC] Conceptual (but fast :) question
  - From: Daniel Bergqvist

Prev by Date: SV: [LARTC] Bandwidth limiting
Next by Date: SV: [LARTC] Conceptual (but fast :) question
Previous by thread: [LARTC] Bandwidth limiting
Next by thread: SV: [LARTC] Conceptual (but fast :) question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [LARTC Home Page] [Netfilter] [Netfilter Development] [Network Development] [Bugtraq] [GCC Help] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux