[LARTC] Complicated Route Statement

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Mike Nielsen wrote:

On Lan A type

route add -net 198.185.204.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.24.1

On Lan B type

route add -net 198.185.204.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 gw 192.168.24.2

On the Cisco type

ip route 192.168.24.128 255.255.255.192 192.168.24.1

> 
> 
> Hi there.
> 
> 
> I am having trouble coming up with a routing statement for the following
> 
> 
> 
>   Lan A is connected to LAn B via a Freeswan site to site VPN
> 
> On lab B there is a cisco router which is handles traffic for an IP address.
> 
> I need to find a way to have traffic to this Other machine routed through the 
> IPsec tunnel, to the Cisco.   
> 
> Here's a crppy ascii art diagram to help explain
> 
> 
> 
>    Lan A
>    192.168.24.128/26 
>    192.168.24.130 iproute2 Firewall and VPN machine
> 	|	
> 	|	IPsec Tunnel
> 	|
>   Lan B
>   192.168.24.1  Iproute2 Firewall and VPN machine
>   192.168.24.0/26  ---  192.168.24.2 Cisco Router <-->  198.185.204.0/24      
>                  	
> So basically I need a route statement that says
> 
> route any traffic to 198.185.204.0/24 to 192.168.24.2 Via  192.168.24.2 
> 
> ??
> 
> Any help you all could give would be greatly appreciate
> 	
> 

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Matthew S. Crocker 
Vice President / Internet Division         Email: matthew@crocker.com
Crocker Communications                     Phone: (413) 746-2760
PO BOX 710                                 Fax:   (413) 746-3704
Greenfield, MA 01302-0710                  http://www.crocker.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux