-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mihai RUSU wrote: | Hi | | I am trying to upgrade our systems with 2.4.20/HTB3 (before that I used | 2.4.9 based kernel with HTB2 patch with no such problems). Since it booted | the new kernel I get a lot of kernel messages that keeps klogd using CPU. | | Here is a sample: | | Jan 21 09:57:34 s kernel: KERNEL: assertion (cl && cl->un.leaf.q->q.qlen) failed at sch_htb.c(959) | Jan 21 09:58:05 s last message repeated 447911 times | Jan 21 09:59:06 s last message repeated 879964 times | Jan 21 10:00:07 s last message repeated 901413 times | | I can comment out that assertion from sources but what exactly does that | warning mean ? Should I silently ignore it or do I need to fix it ? | | Also when I run our htb configuration script I get a lot of this kind of | messages: | | Jan 21 09:50:15 s kernel: uantum of class 10056B is small. Consider r2q change | .<4>HTB: quantum of class 100578 is small. Consider r2q change.<4>HTB: quantum o | | and so on... | | What is wrong with the script ? Why doesnt HTB3 like it ? These messages appear because of too small rates or ceils for that classes (10:056B, 10:0578, ...). The implicit value for r2q is 10 and because of this the quantum value is too small. "Consider r2q change" it's a good ideea indeed ;-) You can take a look at devik's faq page, maybe it can help: http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/htbfaq.htm I don't know if that assertion has the same reason, I haven't noticed something like that in my logs. - -- Catalin Bucur mailto:cata@geniusnet.ro NOC @ Genius Network SRL - Galati - Romania -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE+LTU8pDe20wwI9oIRAo+HAJ90pY9n1oCHkxn4vT+JeTUtkr/3fwCffHlU uBMA2jrV0D1+P5moftwTjbA= =yiPG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
