Re: u32 and netfilter

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 04 December 2002 20:01, James Ma wrote:
> Hi, All,
>
> My understanding is u32 filter is very powerful filter and could do
> anything about IP header filtering, then why do we sometimes use
> netfilering in IPtables? One advantege I guess is in netfilering, there is
> usage counter? Are there other advantges using netfilter (such as delay,
> flexibility)? What is the disadvantages to us Netfilter?
>
> In summary, what are the considerations to select u32 or netfilter as
> classifier for QoS?
I'm not sure, but I think matching a u32 filter is based on a tree-like 
structure.  The fw filter can be faster on the filter part if you use the 
mark as minor number.  But you still have a lot of iptables rules to test.  
And I think you have to test them 1 by 1.
So I think the fw filter will be slower.

Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/


[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux