> .. snip .. > > > > Code: 8b 48 3c 89 d0 03 43 54 39 c1 78 14 39 d1 bf f5 ff ff ff 74 > > <0>Kernel panic: Aiee, killing interrupt handler! > > In interrupt handler - not syncing > > > > Same problem here, until I found that one should (must?) use different > IMQ devices for PREROUTING and POSTROUTING. > HTH Many, many thanks Razvan!!! It was the problem. I removed one PRE- or POSTROUTING rule and see the magic: I can't reproduce the kernel panic. So now the question is: Is it possible to use the SAME IMQ device for ingress and egress trafffic (as I tryed to use)? If not, why, and if yes how? Thank you again, Thomas _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
