Re: CBQ or HTP accuracy

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thierry Coutelier wrote:



Hello,

I am rate limiting traffic going to some IP addresses using CBQ
(and want to change to HTB sometime).

While testing with different packet sizes I found out that I could go above the
rate limit I set. (even with HTB)

The values I use are: rate: 768kbit weight 77kbit allot 10000 avpkt 1512
I did not change the cell or other parameters.
My root qdisc is set to 40MBit.

With those values I am able to go up to 840kbit/s with packets sizes of 612 or 1224.
With other values it's less except for very low values.

Changing the allot value (If I understood well allot*weight=max packets per round)
it only gets worst (tested with 1000 and 50000).

AVPKT is only used for maxidle so it should not change anything ?

What values should I tweak to have the max rate never exeeded and still be able
to come very near my max-rate using 1460 bytes packets ?

Would HTB be more accruate ?


Thanks for the HELP.

Thierry,

to my knowledge, HTB is more predictable than CBQ and easier to set up.

If you want more accuracy, I suggest you modify a file in the kernel source: include/net/pkt_sched.h

Change the #define for PSCHED_CLOCK_SOURCE from PSCHED_JIFFIES to PSCHED_CPU.

I've read this suggestion on the list but never tried it yet. Note that this is valid only for CPUs that support a TSC (Pentium and up).

Regards,

Stephane


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux