> i think that both cbq and htb will won't do good, beacouse (as i see it) > the estimator is based on the bandwidth known by the kernel so that is at > cbq by the tc ... bandwidth xxx parameter, and at htb ???? mmm no param, > probably from rate/ceil or ???? > and the logic is that the kernel sends the packet and after at the > interface driver is droped/delayed. So only if the kernel cbq/htb "look" > at the errors on the medium maybe they estimate well. > I am planning to test this specific scenario in a week or two. I will let you know my conclusions. Mathieu. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
