Re: iptables, nat and traffic shaping woes

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 08 October 2002 20:57, Aaron Clausen wrote:
> As I try to solve my problems with iptables, nat and traffic shaping (with
> ip accounting thrown intot he mix) a friend of mine just sent this claim.
> Is it true?  Will I have to step back to ipchains, or is there a way to
> force packets through the traffic shaping filters using iptables?
>
> > If you are using iptables, you MUST forget it, or change to
> > ipchains, because
> > masq is done by nat table, and shaping is done by mangle table. I
> > cannot found
> > any way to drive the packet 1. thru nat, than mangle, instead of
> > using OUTPUT
> > and FORWARD.
Shaping is not done by mangle table, shaping is done when the packet leaves 
the box.  But marking is done in the mangle table.  I don't understand what's 
the problem.  You can mark the packets in mangle and masq in nat ???

You can find more info on www.docum.org under KPTD.


Stef

-- 

stef.coene@docum.org
 "Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
     http://www.docum.org/
     #lartc @ irc.oftc.net

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/


[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux