Small update - I just transposed the Wondershaper from the howto (that I thought was okay before) into a script - it lasted about 1min :-/ Unfortunately, I forgot to take down the oops message before rebooting the box... On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 13:27, Mattt wrote: > Greetings List'ers :-) > > Have been playing around with QoS, and have a problem, and some > questions... Oh yeah, Debian Woody, 2.4.19, 512/128(pppoe). > > Problem : kernel oops's (sadly, unlogged - though I have a display on > the router, so could transpose the oops if need be...). Using either > version of WonderShaper (CBQ), I get a kernel oops - it seems to take a > little longer with the older version, but mebbe that's co-inkydink... I > manually entered the script from the lartc howto, and that seemed to be > okay (tested for about five mins so far, then tried WS1.0, which oops'ed > in less than 3...). I haven't gotten as far as any link testing yet, but > things 'feel' different when the shapers are up... I'm using the Debian > PPPoE package at present, but have built support into the new > (QoS-enabled) kernel, and will no doubt switch to that (does anyone have > any comments about the value of such a move?). > > Question : I have a Billion aDSL modem/router/etc. It has a web > interface and all manner of other features. This stuff (particualrly the > interface) are normally sucked through the ethernet (or usb, but we > don't touch that...) connection to the host. However, I put the modem > into bridged mode so I could use PPPoE/shaping/netfilter, etc on the > Linux router, which entails *not* assigning an address to the NIC. Of > course, this stops me from being able to access the modem's web > interface. I guess it's hardly that important, given the setup, but it > would still be nice to be able to at least get to it in case it's ever > necessary (for a quick test-bench reconfig and back, perhaps...). > Everything still seems to work when the interface *does* have an IP, > though - is it okay to have an address on this NIC? Could that be what's > choking tc (probably not, as it still oops'es the kernel with no address > on it...). The router in question has three legs - one going to the > 'secure' local network, one going to the DSL 'modem', and one (two > transparently bridged NICS) going to the DMZ, in case any of that > matters. > > -- > Cheers, > Mattt icq : 117539757 > Network and Tech Dood, www : above.nq4u.net > aboveNetworks. > mattt@above.nq4u.net jabber: mattt@jabber.expressnet.net.au > > What's got four legs and an arm? A happy Pit Bull... > > _______________________________________________ > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ > -- Cheers, Mattt. icq : 117539757 aboveNetworks www : www.above.nq4u.net mattt@above.nq4u.net jabber: mattt@jabber.above.nq4u.net What's got four legs and an arm? A happy Pit Bull... _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
