> > Hello, > > On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Tobias Geiger wrote: > >> to be precisly: the problem is i have several nexthops (e.g. ppp0 >> +eth1 +eth2) for the same route and this WHOLE Route is deleted, >> although only the ppp0-device dissapears... >> and i cannot add several entries in different tables, cause this seems >> not to do failover > > Yes, similar behavior appeared in latest 2.4.19pre kernels, > it looks like a recommendation the users to recreate their routes > because a device in nexthop was unregistsred. Is this true for > your setup? > Yes. i used 2.4.19pre-10 kernel. This behaviour affects only ppp-devices (never tried ippp but i guess it's the same) i also wondered, why failover doesn't work when using different route-entries for each nexthop... another confusing thing: using "nexthop via dev ppp0" in a table made me think that i don't need a gateway address at all... but unfortunatly that's no the case :(seems that ip searches the gateway address itself so that after appp-reconnect (where i get another gateway address) the table-entries aren't valid anymore. Thanks Tobias _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
