> > 1) I want to deploy a box in bridge mode first of all. > > 2) I would _want_ to traffic shape based on mac, not > > IP, but this doesnt seem possible. It isnt vital for me > > though, ip will work. > > 3) I want each ip (well, preferrably MAC, but...) to > > have 3 mbit of bandwidth. > On one level this makes no sense. Well, I was a bit unclear, or rather unsure of what I really wanted. I actually want clients that use more bandwidth to have less priority, which is what wrr can do. >What if you have more clients than > bandwidth? Clearly you want to lower the 3MB to bandwidth/#clients. > What if you have extra bandwidth? You probably want to share the > excess rather than waste the bandwidth. In fact you probably want to > share the bandwidth dynamically among the active clients. > All of this is just what's done by SFQ Interesting. But would SFQ for example, result in low latency on a heavily used connection for clients that doesnt use much bandwidth? --- John Bäckstrand _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
