Re: Questions about HTB classes with an SFQ

Linux Advanced Routing and Traffic Control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



sfq MUST be leaf because it is classless.
devik

On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Joshua Snyder wrote:

> I have read most of the documents regarding both Htb and Sfq and I
> still am not sure if it is best to put the Sfq on the leaf Htb or to put
> it closer to the root class.  All of the docs for Htb say to put it on the
> leaf classes but the Sfq stuff says to put it closer to the root(but not
> on the root).  If my case every leaf class is only going to be one
> machine/user.  I want to have fairness between machines(I don't want one
> person to get all of the bandwidth).  I don't think putting Sfq on the
> leaf classes will get me this, but I haven't been able to find a place
> that says this for sure...
>
> 				josh
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
>
>

_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

[Index of Archives]     [LARTC Home Page]     [Netfilter]     [Netfilter Development]     [Network Development]     [Bugtraq]     [GCC Help]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Fedora Users]
  Powered by Linux