On Tuesday 30 April 2002 23:38, Udayan Borkar wrote: > Hi, > > Question on Linux-CBQ. I have a Pentium 4 based PC running Redhat 7.2 > (kernel 2.4.7) with 2 100-Base T ethernet interfaces (Eth0, Eth1). Traf= fic > received on Eth0 is sent out on Eth1. > > I am trying to restrict the outgoing traffic rate on Eth1 to 50Mbits/se= c. > However, when I use the configuration below, I find that the rate on Et= h1 > is about 5 Mbits/sec. If I delete the keywords bounded, isolated, I get > a rate of 90 Mbits/sec. Measurements were made over an interval of 15 s= ec > to 1 min) > > On trying other Minburst, Maxburst values, the rate changes (e.g. Maxbu= rst > =3D 300, Minburst =3D 70) produces 25Mbits/sec etc. > > (I was trying to create a hierarchy of classes whose total rate needs t= o > be limited to 50Mbits/sec, I have managed to reduce the problem from th= at > to this simplified configuration. I would prefer not to use HTB at the > moment). You can do it also with CBQ. But you have to be carefull by choosing the= =20 parameters. > Can someone take a quick look at the configuration below and tell me wh= at > I am doing wrong? (Ip address of Eth0=3D10.1.1.2, netmask=3D255.255.255= =2E0; > Eth1=3D10.1.2.2,netmask=3D255.255.255.0) The commands seems ok to me. I tried to bound the outgoing traffic on a=20 10mbit card and I had some good results=20 (http://www.docum.org/stef.coene/qos/tests/cbq/bounded/bounded.html). Bu= t I=20 also found that the isolated parameter is not working and can distrub the= =20 setup. So, can you try again with only the bounded and no isolated param= eter=20 ? Stef --=20 stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
