On Wednesday 20 March 2002 12:09, mario.wolff@sercon.de wrote: > Hello ALL, > is there a way to have a device independent qdisc, or a qdisc on some k= ind > of virtuall interface? > > Background: I have a 5-Interface-Router with one Internet-Uplink. The > Router should connect the clients on the other Interfaces to the Intern= et > and to each other client. As i understood the hole TC stuff i can only = get > influence of outgoing traffic. In my case i can reduce the traffic of e= ach > net by putting a qdisc on the netinterface. I=B4ve done that and it run= s > fine. But the different nets could not take the free bandwith of other = nets > because they have not the same root. > > If i could have a device independent qdisc i could take this as root an= d > filter the traffic for the the different nets to the classes. You can use the IMQ device. ALL packets are first queued in this device = and=20 after that it's enqueued in the real device. =20 http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/imq.htm Or you can take an other box and put that between the router and the upli= nk. Stef --=20 stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.openprojects.net
